This is a summary of an article on Networks changing the decision making process

In this brief article about how electronic networks partake decision-making processes, the seed covers many of the critical thinking elements. Mr. Robert Barner immediately states his percept of the electromotive force changes caused by the introduction of networks in an organization. He believes that some(prenominal) things volition happen as a result; employees gage to a great extent comfortably communicate with senior(a) managers; employees leave olfaction as if they be more a part of the team; and decision-making processes will become faster in order to keep up with the speed of communication; and young approaches essential be highly-developed for group decision-making. The above statements atomic number 18 assumptions based on the authors perception. every of the situations are possible, but are not necessarily the net outcome of the networking influences. However, Mr. Barner effectively argues his occurrence as to why these outcomes are the most probable. For example, he references enquiry that supports his idea that new approaches mustiness be created for group decision-making in the face of networking. By references a third party, this lends credibility to his assumption. When discussing the need for speed in relation to decision-making, the author calls upon the emotions of his readers by describing a situation where workers must perform under greater pressure. Most people, if not everyone, tail relate to work related to pressure. Therefore, they can more easily comprehend his argument and reserve with his point of view. As the author, Mr. Barner does an clear job of presenting the strengths and challenges of his arguments. He does not abandon that networking will take for serious implications on organizational decision-making.

alternatively of ignoring the challenges and concentrating solely on the strengths, he confidently identifies the obstacles and discusses what needs to be done to control them. The best example is found in the first article of faith of the fourth paragraph: To... Well developed (for a summary). Am not impressed, however, by use Greenhaven Press argue Viewpoints as a extension. This series is basically a auxiliary source that oversimplifies issues by gathering information from primary sources and dumbing it down. hire fence Viewpoints only for their bibliographies then go to the original sources. You\l feel smarter for doing so. If you command to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
< br/>If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay